Glenn Beck says that he will move to Canada, but will Canada agree to accept him? In the comedy movie of 1977 vintage, Slap Shot, Paul Newman coached a hockey team of losers who won the big game. One of the team members was a Canadian that the US wanted to deport, but Canada would not take him back. Rush Limbaugh promised to move to Costa Rica, but he still lives in a mansion in Florida. I’ll believe Glenn Beck’s promise only after I see him crossing the border.
A New American TEA Party, The Counterrevolution Against Bailouts, Handouts, Reckless Spending, and More Taxes by John M. O’Hara. I have read dozens of books from right-wing authors trashing Barack Obama and this book is the worst of the lot. I read it cover to cover, but don’t you waste your time. It is not about the TEA Party as much as it is a vehicle for criticizing the President. It is chock-a-block with false and misleading information followed by 38 pages of notes to lend it an air of authenticity. I followed one endnote that purported to quote Barack Obama. It did not sound like anything that the President would say, so I was curious about it. The alleged quotation cited Glenn Beck paraphrasing what he thought Barack meant. Phony, phony, phony. O’Hara’s closest competitor on the right is Michelle Malkin who wrote the introduction.
O’Hara frequently praises community organizing. Community organizing for the TEA Party is GOOD. Community organizing for the poor as Barack Obama and Saul Alinsky did is BAD.
Please see this interesting and timely article on the TEA Party as an Astroturf organization. They peaked just in time to do maximum damage in the 2010 election that enabled the GOP to take control of many states and gerrymander Congressional districts. We will live with those results until 2020 or until the gerrymandering can be corrected.
- Will The Tea Party Fail Again? (constitutionclub.org)
- Eighty Six Articles of Impeachment against Obama… “There is a growing groundswell within American Republican and Tea Party ranks that impeachment proceedings should be initiated against President Obama on a whole list of violations of the Constitution a (madashelland.wordpress.com)
- The Tea Party, Ted Nugent, and The Republican Renewal (duanegraham.wordpress.com)
- Tea Party Group “Deeply Embarrassed” by Failure to Plan Pro-Gun Rallies (alternet.org)
Here in very red state Utah, two people were heard discussing current events. When the discussion turned to the recent death of bin Laden, one person stated that she didn’t believe anything that Obama said. The other person agreed. That exchange started me thinking about what informs their opinions. Where do they get their information and why do they reach the conclusions they do?
My wife works in a local office, and she tells me that staff meetings are frequently preceded by criticism of Barack by the participants waiting for the meeting to begin. Before my recent retirement, I worked at a local hospital with mostly much younger co-workers. We didn’t discuss politics often, but when we did, most seemed impervious to argument.
When I seek the news on TV, I flip from MSNBC on the left to CNN in the center to Fox on the right in an effort to escape the ubiquitous commercials. Here in Southern Utah, CNN is labeled the Communist News Network. Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are both popular here. The local branch of Barnes and Noble features many titles “authored” by Glenn Beck.
The local newspaper features mostly conservative guest columns. The same day my neighbors were discussing the death of bin Laden, there was a column in the paper authored by Michelle Malkin entitled, “The fog of the fog.” In that article, she criticized the White House for the apparent confusion in the release of the details of the raid that killed bin Laden. I have read, with difficulty, two of her books that criticize Barack Obama and his administration. It is hard to believe that any person or group of people in government could be so evil or incompetent.
In the 2008 presidential election, John McCain ran a mistake-ridden campaign, and the economy was lurching toward a possible Great Depression 2. It was not surprising that Barack won under those circumstances, and barring a bad economy, I expect that he will be victorious in 2012. The election should not be close, but a high unemployment rate may make it closer than it would be otherwise. Barack won handily in 2008, but the margin of victory was 5 to 10 points less than I had expected, and I attribute that to a lingering Bradley effect in some parts of America.
When I moved to Southern California in 1965, I started watching the local news on TV and that news concentrated on Los Angeles. Tom Bradley was a member of the Los Angeles City Council after a career with the Los Angeles Police Department. I was highly impressed with Tom Bradley. In my seventy years, I have been highly impressed with only three politicians before Barack Obama, each from a different party, Barry Goldwater, Tom Bradley and Ralph Nader.
In my younger days, I voted the straight Republican ticket. When Tom Bradley decided to run for governor of California, I decided to vote for him, since he was the better candidate. Apparently many others agreed with me; the polls showed him winning. However, when the votes were counted, he had lost to George Deukmejian, a largely unknown candidate from Long Beach. Deukmejian served two four-year terms and then returned to relative obscurity. Bradley continued serving as Mayor of Los Angeles for a total of 20 mostly successful years.
Although Barack Obama is our first African-American president, the Bradley effect still exists in parts of America. It is very hard not to attribute some of the local hostility to him to the Bradley effect. The balance of opposition to him and his policies can be either philosophical or due to mis-information. The media available to and chosen by local residents is neither fair nor balanced.