Loss of privacy

Utah

Utah (Photo credit: rayb777)

In time of war, we become accustomed to the loss of some of our rights. We assume that they will be restored to us at the end of hostilities, but the war on terror may not end in our lifetimes. What shall we accept in the meantime and what shall we protest against?

Law enforcement here is southern Utah is waging a war against drugs imported into our area from the south via Interstate 15. They are proposing the installation of license plate scanners in both directions to help them spot and apprehend drug smugglers. While the end may be justified, I oppose the means, the plate scanners.

The usual argument is that if you are not a smuggler, then you have nothing to worry about. I disagree. With drones in the skies and license plate scanners on the ground and government surveillance of all electronic communication, I believe that it will be possible for government to keep records of all we do. That is too much of an intrusion into our right to privacy and opens the gates wide to a 1984-style government in the US. Do you agree?

Wisconsin recall election

Scott Walker in 2007 at Marquette University a...

Scott Walker in 2007 at Marquette University as part of “On the Issues with Mike Gousha” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

On June 5, 2012, it is likely that Scott Walker will be recalled. His campaign literature is all about the evil outside influences that are working for his defeat. However, it is only the voters of Wisconsin who are eligible to vote in the forthcoming election. They will be contending with all the campaign funds that Scott Walker has raised out-of-state. Here in Utah, I have received several mailed solicitations for funds. I sent him zip. Overwhelmingly the candidate with the most cash wins. At this moment, the contest in Wisconsin is close. The trend, though, is against Scott Walker. We will soon know whether the will of the people is sufficient to defeat all Scott Walker’s cash. His defeat will be a positive sign going forward to November, IMHO.

Unions part 2

Map usa unions

Map usa unions (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I grew up in a non-union family with Republican tendencies. I have never belonged to a union nor have I been employed at a company with a union. HOWEVER, I believe that having a unionized work force for a significant portion of that work force is beneficial to all workers, union members or not. The US developed a significant and growing middle class after WW2 when large numbers of workers were union members. As union membership has declined, so too has the middle class as good jobs that pay well disappear. Our democracy depends on a vibrant middle class.

Why do managements oppose unionization so strongly? Money and power. Management wants the flexibility to structure work as they see fit, without input or restraint from anyone else. They also want to keep as much of worker productivity as they can to please stockholders and to pad their own compensation. It is a shortsighted policy that reduces the ability of workers to purchase the goods and services that they themselves produce.

Workers need protection by government from employer actions. They also need to band together in unions with other workers for self protection. In this country, we lack free speech in the workplace and we can quit or be fired at will. If you have roots in a community, it is hard to relocate to find another job elsewhere in the country. When my wife and I left California to move to Utah, we did not have a lot of household goods. But the moving bill for less than 500 miles exceeded $5,000.

My first job as an adult involved customer service for an electronics company. I did well and received a generous salary, but not what I felt I was worth. After 21 years I left their employ. Part of my dissatisfaction was monetary, but the greater dissatisfaction came from the general manager’s actions. At first, he encouraged all employees to grow on the job and take responsibilities that required us to stretch. At some point his goals changed, but were not announced. At first I could not believe the change since it seemed so out of character. Eventually over time, I realized the change was permanent. The interests of those of us who worked there were being subordinated to his goal of becoming company president. The division where I worked earned impressive profits. The manger decided to squeeze more profits from us to impress the board of directors. He succeeded in becoming president and the rest of us paid a price. I decided to leave even though I knew that finding comparable employment would be difficult.

Eventually I decided to enter the healthcare industry at a much lower salary. I started at the bottom and worked my way up. I still earn much less than my first job but I am enjoying myself much more. While employed at a hospital in California, I was able to observe at first hand how management combats a unionization effort. The nurses wanted a union and were able to enlist the California Nurses Association‘s help in the effort. While working the night shift on weekends, I was surprised to find top management roaming the halls at 3, or 4 o’clock in the morning. I never discovered what they were doing, but I suspect that they were watching for pro-union speech and actions. The election was finally held and the union lost narrowly. There was joy in management and even among employees who were not nurses and would not have been affected. I was disappointed because I wanted to see a union in action close up.

There is a general correspondence between the rate of national unionization and how well the average person lives: the rate of unionization in the US has dropped from a high of 36% to today’s under 16% rate. Unionization in Denmark is about 95% and it exceeds 85% in Finland. The rate in Germany is 30% plus and I have been unable to find the rate in France, although it is less than in the US. The average person in those countries lives a better, less stressed life than the average worker in the US. If you try to point that out to the Party of No, they will immediately shout socialism. My question to you is this. Are you willing to live a less fulfilling, more stressed life because of someone else’s prejudices?

Big Brother

big brother

big brother (Photo credit: Vince_Lamb)

1984′s Big Brother is planning to move to Utah as soon as his new digs are finished. Workers are racing to complete Big Brother’s new home in the Salt Lake City suburb of Bluffdale. Once completed, the NSA (National Security Agency) will be able to monitor and store for future reference all electronic communication within the US. They believe that they will be able to break encrypted messages in the near future. That means all email and cell phone messages and conversations will be available to the government if they ever want to examine your past history to include web usage. They will be looking for suspicious trends that may develop over a period of years. If you are not a suspect now, you could become one in the future. Then NSA analysts will be able to dig back in the records to determine what you doing and saying in years past.

To prevent government surveillance, people will be forced to resort to face to face meeting out-of-doors, just like the Mafia, or start writing to each other the old-fashioned way, by means of hand-written letters, delivered by the USPS, if it still exists. Then all you will have to worry about is surveillance by your mailman/woman.

Softball

A softball.

A softball. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The number one reason visitors come to Saint George, Utah is to play or watch softball. When I moved here, I thought that the number one attraction would be the scenic wonders in the area, including Zion National Park. According to the Chamber of Commerce, I was wrong. That led me to construct the following fictional league of four local teams to compete in a semi-pro league.

  1. The Saint George Dragons
  2. The Hurricane Winds
  3. The Cedar City Waxwings
  4. The Mesquite Toes

These teams do not exist, but they should.

Please see Fantasy baseball