Polls and debates

Image representing PollDaddy as depicted in Cr...

Image via CrunchBase

The polls and the GOP debates are useless. They do not help the voters to make a wise choice. The only thing the polls tell us is that the voters are undecided because they don’t like their choices and because they lack the information on which to base a decision. There are too many debates and they tell us little or nothing. The media treats the polls as a horse race and the debates as boxing matches. We could as easily place the candidates in a fighting cage and select the victor as the candidate. That would only tell us who is the physically fittest, not who is qualified to be president.

I would replace the debates with TV programs in which the candidates respond in writing to written, pertinent questions. The candidates need not be on the program in person, only their brief answers which could be compared on the air to the answers supplied by all the others. Voters could study the answers later at their leisure on-line. I would require that the answers be brief and not refer to the other candidates. In many cases, answers could be limited to three choices: yes, no or declined to answer.

We have two cats that are adopted strays, Little Foo, a female, and Gary, a male. There are several other strays in the neighborhood that resemble Gary so we have assumed that he was a normal male and we had him neutered when we adopted him. OUCH. Now we are not so sure. Every morning Gary makes a beeline (cat-line) to our closet. Later in the day after a nap lasting several hours, he comes out of the closet.

Please see Little Foo | Cat tree | Little Foo part 2

Gerrymander

Deutsch: Elbridge Gerry (1744–1814), US-amerik...

Image via Wikipedia

Elbridge Gerry was a Massachusetts politician, and a US vice-president under Madison, who lived from 1744 to 1814. While he was governor of Massachusetts, a Congressional district in the state was given such a convoluted shape that it resembled a salamander to some viewers. Reportedly someone said, that’s not a salamander, that’s a Gerrymander and the name endured.

Every ten years, the US takes a census that is used in apportioning seats in the US House of Representatives among the states. Then the states in most cases must redraw the boundaries of Congressional districts to account for changing populations. In recent decades, the districts have been more and more drawn to reduce competition within them and re-elect incumbents.

When incumbents are sure of re-election by the voters, they lose incentive to represent and respond to voters. Corruption becomes more and more tempting as big money comes to dominate elections. Movements are afoot in Florida, California, New York and possibly other states to draw more competitive Congressional districts. This is a very good thing if we are to make our democracy representative again. It does no good to throw the bums out if the system stays broken and we replace one set of bums with another.

Open primaries

United States Presidential Primaries 2008, Dem...

Image via Wikipedia

 

Open  run-off primaries, a single primary rather than separate Republican and Democratic primaries, may be the trend of the future. The top two or three candidates face each other in the general election, no matter the party label. I have not yet investigated them to decide whether or not I support the idea. However, I have begun to detect opposition to open primaries by some on the Right. So that is one factor in their favor.

Jan Brewer’s book

Scorpions for Breakfast

Scorpions for Breakfast

Scorpions for Breakfast, My Fight Against Special Interests, Liberal Media, and Cynical Politicos to Secure America’s Border by Jan Brewer. The subtitle tells it all and there really is no need to read further. However, I did read the entire book and I think that the following is what Barack objected to.

“We sat down and started with some chitchat. but after a few minutes the president’s tone got serious–and condescending. He proceeded to lecture me about everything he was doing to promote ‘comprehensive immigration reform,’ which was code for encouraging more illegal immigration by letting those already in the country illegally jump the line. He said they were doing everything they could, but the system was broken. He didn’t mention the violence on the border, the drug cartels, or the enormous costs being borne by the citizens of states like Arizona. He mentioned that the Department of Justice was reviewing SB 1070 and that he was leaving to them the decision whether to sue. ‘I will not put my finger on the scales of justice with regard to this review,’ he said. ‘I have completely delegated the decision to them.’ Joe and I exchanged a glance. We were skeptical, to say the least.

“It wasn’t long before I realized I was hearing the president’s stump speech. Only I was supposed to listen without talking. Did he care to hear the view from the actual scene at the border? Did the opinions and observations of the people of Arizona mean anything to him? I didn’t think so. His mind seemed made up. If he knew about the escalating  levels of violence, the kidnappings, the drop houses, the home invasions, the spotters, and the drug mules, he didn’t give any indication. It was as though President Obama thought he would lecture me and I would learn at his knee. He was patronizing. He understood that we were ‘frustrated’ he said–heck, yes we were frustrated!–but he didn’t seem interested in knowing why. Then it dawned on me: He’s treating me like the cop he had over for a beer after he bad-mouthed the Cambridge police, I thought. He thinks he can humor me and then get rid of me.

“I listened to about ten minutes of this. Finally the president’s lecture ended and it was my turn. I hadn’t interrupted the president because I respect the office, and I was determined to show respect. But now I was ready to give him a piece of my mind.”

And then she did. Barack’s impression of the meeting was that it was cordial. Funny how two people witnessing the same event can come away with such differing impressions, but that is human nature. We each bring differing life experiences and expectations to life’s daily events. In her book, Jan Brewer brought a differing viewpoint to the meeting and encountered different experiences with the media and pickets after the meeting. Can there be a true meeting of minds between Brewer and Obama? I don’t know.

Please see Jan Brewer